Re: class=reftest-wait

On Aug 3, 2013, at 16:04, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> wrote:

> On 8/3/13 3:39 AM, Tobie Langel wrote:
>> If this is to allow scripting of the test, shouldn't we standardize on a JS callback instead of having to poll for a classname change?
> 
> It's to allow scripting of the test, and adding a mutation observer is not polling...

True. How's the support for that nowadays?

--tobie

Received on Saturday, 3 August 2013 19:00:39 UTC