- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 10:45:20 +0200
- To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?"G\=E9rard\?\= Talbot" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Cc: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "Public css-testsuite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Gérard Talbot wrote:
> > http://people.opera.com/howcome/2013/tests/multicol/column-fill-auto.html
> > http://people.opera.com/howcome/2013/tests/multicol/column-fill-balance.html
>
> Those are excellent tests, simplified and minimalist. Albeit
>
> 1-
> line 13: font-size: 1em;
> should be replaced with
> font-size: 1.25em;
> so that computed font-size value can be dividable by 5px, otherwise
> baseline-alignment of glyphs won't be reliable, won't be accurate across
> platforms.
Right.
> 2-
> line 18: overflow: hidden;
>
> Why overflow: hidden? This declaration is not needed, not necessary in
> both tests.
Inherited from the "original" test. Not needed.
> 3-
> line 19: background: transparent;
>
> By default, the initial value is already transparent. So, here too: not
> needed and not necessary in both tests.
Right.
> 4-
> I would re-use the same distinguishible 'o' and 't' characters in both
> tests; this would furthermore highlight and accentuate the code
> difference between the tests.
Yes.
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Saturday, 3 August 2013 08:46:01 UTC