"Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com> a écrit : > In Test the Web Forward@Beijing, it was mentioned that the tests written > should fail even when the browser doesn't support that feature *at all*. Kang-Hao, As far as I am concerned and involved, such goal is a rule: you want only-CSS1-capable browsers and only-CSS2.1-capable browsers to fail such tests. Sometimes, such goal is not possible, achievable, therefore there are exceptions. > I am wondering if this is necessary because it is not at all > straightforward how you do this for 'border-radius'. > > The idea I just suggested to a participant is to add something like > > <div id="dummy"> > You would not see this if your browser supports 'border-radius'. > </div> > > #dummy { > border-radius: 500em; > width: 10000em; > height: 10000em; > overflow: hidden; /* the text would be clipped */ > } > > to the test and not to the reference, but as the name suggests, it's > quite dummy. > > Given all browsers support 'border-radius' without prefix now, is > something like the thingy above still necessary? And does anyone have a > better idea? If I understand your test - and I'm not sure that I do right now - , this is an extreme and edge case. Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/Received on Sunday, 21 October 2012 19:09:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:18 UTC