- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:23:15 -0500
- To: "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Public CSS testsuite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Arron, [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/background-position-applies-to-014.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-position-applies-to-014.htm [src] http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/src/backgrounds/background-position-applies-to-014.xht As you know, I am modifying [property_name]-applies-to-[001|002|003|004|005|006|007|013|014] tests so that they all will have the following characteristics: a) the table has a non-auto set width and 'table-layout: fixed' declaration: that way, we make sure that fixed table layout algorithm is being triggered in those tests. b) the table has 2 rows and 2 cells per row c) the cells are not empty: they have some content. This is furthermore important for cases like inline-table as there is browser incompatibilities and divergences on vertical-alignment of empty inline-table. In background-position-applies-to-014, I have set the border on the inline-table element and not on the cell. Otherwise the test is not reliable. Otherwise the cell border should overlap partially the background-image. Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 02:23:51 UTC