- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 12:40:04 -0400
- To: "Øyvind Stenhaug" <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Cc: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, "HÃ¥kon Wium Lie" <howcome@opera.com>
Le Mer 16 mai 2012 10:51, Øyvind Stenhaug a écrit : > On Tue, 15 May 2012 21:37:07 +0200, Gérard Talbot > <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org> wrote: > >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css3-multicol/nightly-unstable/html4/containing-001.htm >> Issue 1 >> ------- [snipped] If Ahem font is reused in the reftest in the same manner, then maybe this is okay since baseline alignment is not the target of the test. Personnally, I do not and would not do this. >> Issue 2 >> ------- >> >> line 19 widows: 1; >> orphans: 1; >> >> I do not understand why widows and orphans have to be specified: is >> there a need to use, specify 1? > > In this case it doesn't look like it's necessary. > >> If/Assuming these declarations are >> needed, then shouldn't the test be flagged as paged? > > The "paged" flag means "Only valid for paged media". I believe there is > one or more case where such declarations *are* needed, to allow for > column > breaking after the first line and/or before the last line of a block. > That > doesn't mean the tests aren't valid for non-paged media. Indeed, it does not mean that the tests are not valid for non-paged media. I am saying I do not see why widows and orphans is specified in that test; it's not necessary, it looks to me to be 2 extraneous declarations. Issue 3 ------- http://test.csswg.org/suites/css3-multicol/nightly-unstable/html4/multicol-reduce-000.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css3-multicol/nightly-unstable/html4/multicol-basic-001.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css3-multicol/nightly-unstable/html4/multicol-basic-003.htm To a human, Firefox 12.0, Chrome 19.0.1084.46, Safari 5.1.7 and Konqueror 4.8.3 FAIL these tests. To a machine/software running automated tests-reftests checking, Firefox 12.0, Chrome 19.0.1084.46, Safari 5.1.7 and Konqueror 4.8.3 PASS these tests. Their correspondent/associated reftests http://test.csswg.org/suites/css3-multicol/nightly-unstable/html4/multicol-reduce-000-ref.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css3-multicol/nightly-unstable/html4/multicol-basic-ref.htm will create false positives; the reftest is not reliable. I'm afraid there are MORE tests versus reftests like these. Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 16:40:40 UTC