Peter and I discussed this situation last night. While in general we recommend reporting errors in shepherd, in some cases you might want to propose fixes (i.e. submit a patch and ask the owner to approve it), because that's more straightforward. The workflow we imagine is: 1. "hg copy" the file to your own work directory. (This preserves history.) 2. Make edits. Commit and push them to the repo. 3. Ask the owner (or someone else, if s/he is inactive) to review your changes. 4. If at this point, both you and the owner agree the test is correct, and you don't work for the same company, it's been reviewed: you've reviewed their work, and they've reviewed yours. So add review links. 4. The owner/reviewer hg deletes the old copy. Eventually Shepherd will make this easier with "Fork this test" and "Adopt this version" buttons, but for now, we'll have to hg copy / hg delete things manually. :) ~fantasaiReceived on Saturday, 16 June 2012 18:37:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:18 UTC