W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > June 2012

Workflow for Patching Others' Tests

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:37:08 -0700
Message-ID: <4FDCD254.5060704@inkedblade.net>
To: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Peter and I discussed this situation last night. While in general we recommend reporting
errors in shepherd, in some cases you might want to propose fixes (i.e. submit a patch
and ask the owner to approve it), because that's more straightforward. The workflow we
imagine is:

   1. "hg copy" the file to your own work directory. (This preserves history.)
   2. Make edits. Commit and push them to the repo.
   3. Ask the owner (or someone else, if s/he is inactive) to review your changes.
   4. If at this point, both you and the owner agree the test is correct, and
      you don't work for the same company, it's been reviewed: you've reviewed
      their work, and they've reviewed yours. So add review links.
   4. The owner/reviewer hg deletes the old copy.

Eventually Shepherd will make this easier with "Fork this test" and "Adopt this version"
buttons, but for now, we'll have to hg copy / hg delete things manually. :)

Received on Saturday, 16 June 2012 18:37:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:18 UTC