- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:44:53 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:45 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > I went through the Media Queries test suite today and filled out an > implementation report for Chrome. > I've posted it on the website. Someone from Webkit might want to take a > look: > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/MediaQueries/20120229/reports/implement-report.html > > I was very generous with Webkit's results. They were all manually-generated > by running > equivalent static @media tests that I made up on the fly using Hixie's DOM > Viewer, > because the scripted tests won't run correctly in Webkit: among other > problems, it > apparently returns true everywhere it's supposed to return false, resulting > in lots of > bogus failures on features that are otherwise well-implemented. > > Since Webkit's error-handling is fairly broken (it treats unknown media > features and > certain invalid expressions as false rather than malformed), a number of > statically- > testable parsing tests were also marked as Unknown, because their actual > results (pass > or fail) would be inaccurate. I also marked the entire color-index and > resolution blocks > as red, because neither feature seems to be implemented. > > If anyone has concerns about the results being posted, let me know. > Otherwise > Webkit will just have to be publicly humiliated for having so many more > failures > than any other browser. :) Nope, post away. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 03:45:48 UTC