W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Chrome 20Beta results for Media Queries L3

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:44:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAN4giXqeyDu2mvBuwvdC-ZtP_UstU6_FmTmSdJWAt8MA@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:45 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> I went through the Media Queries test suite today and filled out an
> implementation report for Chrome.
> I've posted it on the website. Someone from Webkit might want to take a
> look:
>  http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/MediaQueries/20120229/reports/implement-report.html
> I was very generous with Webkit's results. They were all manually-generated
> by running
> equivalent static @media tests that I made up on the fly using Hixie's DOM
> Viewer,
> because the scripted tests won't run correctly in Webkit: among other
> problems, it
> apparently returns true everywhere it's supposed to return false, resulting
> in lots of
> bogus failures on features that are otherwise well-implemented.
> Since Webkit's error-handling is fairly broken (it treats unknown media
> features and
> certain invalid expressions as false rather than malformed), a number of
> statically-
> testable parsing tests were also marked as Unknown, because their actual
> results (pass
> or fail) would be inaccurate. I also marked the entire color-index and
> resolution blocks
> as red, because neither feature seems to be implemented.
> If anyone has concerns about the results being posted, let me know.
> Otherwise
> Webkit will just have to be publicly humiliated for having so many more
> failures
> than any other browser. :)

Nope, post away.

Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 03:45:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:18 UTC