- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:59:51 -0400
- To: "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Public css-testsuite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Arron, [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/clear-applies-to-013.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/clear-applies-to-013.htm This test, as worded and as designed, is not ideal and may lead to false positive. The pass/fail conditions sentence should be testing about the relative position of the green square rather than its existence. Actual is: "Test passes if there is a filled green square." Correct is: "Test passes if there is a square below this text." We want the sentence to be as short as possible because tests must pass with a 640px viewport. If the sentence is long and if 'clear: both' is *not* applied to table elements by an UA, then the green square will line-wrap when viewed in a 640px (or so) viewport and such resulting layout will be believed to be a successful implementation of 'clear: both' when it would not be. Right now, I have no proposal other than to change the sentence. There may be other ways to make this test more trustworthy. Also, line 19 #table, #cell { height: 1in; width: 1in; } is not necessary; sufficient is line 19 #cell { height: 1in; width: 1in; } Finally, there is the issue of testing table and clear when such table has a non-empty caption box. Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2012 20:00:21 UTC