- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:05:28 +0100
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, CSS-testsuite <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Thursday, February 16, 2012, 7:57:17 PM, Boris wrote: BZ> On 2/16/12 1:52 PM, Chris Lilley wrote: >> I think we should also allow HTML5 (in the XML serialisation, so existing toolchain can consume it). BZ> Does the existing toolchain consume reftest references? No. But I didn't get the impression that Øyvind was talking about references only. >> ØS> Are #help<link>s always necessary for building? >> If these are omitted them my understanding is that testing by chapter and reporting by chapter won't work. BZ> Is this true specifically for reftest references, which is what Aryeh BZ> was asking about? I wasn't responding to Areyeh in that part. >> Similarly, without the assert of what is being tested, it is hard to check the tests, and its hard to auto-annotate the spec to link to the relevant tests. BZ> It makes sense to put that information in the test. I see no reason to BZ> put it in the reference. In my later response to Aryeh, I had missed that he was referring to reftest references only. -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 20:05:27 UTC