- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:54:38 -0500
- To: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Hello, [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/c5526c-display-000.htm [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/c5526c-display-000.htm While trying to create reftests, I gave a shot to c5526c-display-000 and then realized that almost all browsers fail this test... according to the test author's original expectations as given in the /* comments */ line 33 width: 10.638%; /* refers to parent element's width of 47em. = 5em or 50px */ 0.10638 mult by 47 mult by 10 == 49.9986px Firefox 9.0.1 width's computed value : 49.9833px; used width is 50px though Opera 11.61 width's computed value : 47px (!); used width is 47px Opera 11.61 seems to be truncating the fractional part of the specified value. The only factor that can start with 47 and end with 4.7 is 0.10 or 10%. Chrome 16.0.912.77 : 49px; used width is 49px Konqueror 4.8.0 : 49px; used width is 49px line 69 width: 41.17%; /* = 14em */ Firefox 9.0.1 width's computed value : 139.967px and not 140px; used width is 140px though Opera 11.61 width's computed value : 139px (!); used width is 139px Chrome 16.0.912.77 : 139px; used width is 139px Konqueror 4.8.0 : 139px; used width is 139px Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2012 23:55:10 UTC