- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:51:04 -0700
- To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On 09/07/2011 07:22 PM, Linss, Peter wrote: > Having survived the initial beta test, I'm pleased to announce the new CSS Test Suite Management System (code named 'Shepherd') is now online and ready for use. > > As always, if you find any bugs, please email me immediately. I think it would be useful to split "Needs Work" into more severe (the test is invalid) and less severe cases (the test is valid, but could be better). In the latter case, we'd want to unhook the test from the test results and reporting harness. From Gérard's wiki list of issues, I see these major groups of Needs Work: Needs Work - Incorrect /* The test is wrong and should not be passed or doesn't test what's claimed. * Needs Work - Metadata /* The test metadata needs correction or improvement. */ Needs Work - Usability /* The test is confusing or hard to judge. */ Needs Work - Precision /* The test is imprecise and may give false positives. */ Needs Work - Format /* Syntax errors, format violations, etc. */ ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2011 20:52:10 UTC