- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:28:06 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:42:54 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> > wrote: >> So an element with display: table-row-group "has" the >> list-style-position >> property, but the property does not apply. An assert that reads "The >> 'list-style-position' property applies to elements with 'display' set to >> 'table-row-group'." is at odds with the spec. > > Not necessarily. You're assuming the word means the same thing in the > assert and the propdef table. Pretty much, yes. I think that's a perfectly appropriate assumption. The rel="help" <link>s even point to an anchor in the heading just above that table. If an assert (or file name) uses terms that have a specific usage in the spec, it shouldn't use a conflicting definition. -- Øyvind Stenhaug Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Friday, 2 September 2011 12:28:45 UTC