- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:10:42 -0800
- To: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>, "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Le Ven 25 novembre 2011 1:29, Lachlan Hunt a écrit : > On 2011-11-23 20:57, "Gérard Talbot" wrote: >> Hello Arron and Lachlan, >> >> Several tests, listed below, suggest (in their title and/or in their >> meta assert) that the wider border wins over narrower border even when >> 'border-style: none' and 'border-style: hidden' are involved ... which >> is not true. Even a 'border: red hidden 0px' should always prevail >> over >> any other borders. Even a 'border: red none 100px' should always lose >> over any non-zero narrow border. >> >> Border conflict resolution where wider border wins over narrower >> border >> is true only when border-style 'hidden' or 'none' is not involved >> between 2 borders. >> >> Lachlan testcases (25 testcases) >> ----------------- >> >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/border-conflict-w-001.htm >> >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/border-conflict-w-002.htm >> ... > > I don't understand what you mean. The title isn't meant to suggest > which border wins. It's only an indication of the part of the algorithm > is being tested. I thought this was not clear. Each and all of the border-conflict-w-0?? testcases have in their title "Border Conflict Resolution (width) - [border-style]/[border-style]". In border-conflict-w-001, 'hidden' wins (and always should win) over 'double' (or any other 'border-style') regardless of 'border-width' values of respective collapsing cells. In border-conflict-w-091, 'none' loses (and always should lose) over 'double' (or any other 'border-style') regardless of 'border-width' values of respective collapsing cells. Same thing with 092, 093, 094, 095, 097 and 098 testcases. > The pass conditions in each of the tests indicates > which border should win, and they seem to be correct. They all seem to be correct to me too. regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Friday, 25 November 2011 20:11:18 UTC