- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:37:13 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On 10/16/2010 03:24 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/table-valign-002.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/table-valign-002.xht
> are invalid for the same reasons as table-valign-001, described
> here:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Oct/0230.html
>
> In this case I think the test is relatively easily fixable; I'd
> suggest adding the rule:
> .baseline .one { height: 65px }
I believe table-valign-001 is correct per CSS2.1 Issue 26:
http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-26
Therefore this test should not need a fix. In any case, the thing
you are concerned about is not the focus of the pass condition.
~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 23 October 2010 10:37:51 UTC