- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:27:16 -0700
- To: "Gérard Talbot" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Thursday 2010-10-14 19:24 -0700, "Gérard Talbot" wrote: > > > On Thursday 2010-10-14 18:26 -0700, "Gérard Talbot" wrote: > >> > >> > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/content-072.htm > >> > relies on an attribute expansion mechanism that would expand > >> > <script defer> to <script defer="defer"> as far as what the CSS > >> > attr() function sees. No such mechanism exists in > >> > http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/ , so this test is invalid. I tend to > >> > think it should be removed. > >> > >> The default, implied value for defer attribute is "defer" in HTML > >> 4.01. > >> http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/scripts.html#h-18.2.1 > > > > That's not true in HTML5, and in HTML4 it was only a piece of > > fiction. > > Then, let's test with checked or selected or readonly. > > > The CSS test suite is not the place to test that HTML handling is > > based on SGML DTD processing. > > I agree that the CSS 2.1 test suite should not be an HTML4 test suite at > the same time. But then a browser should also have a decent compliance > with HTML4 to begin with. > > So what's your opinion on testing on minimized attribute checked or > selected or readonly? We should not be testing for the values of minimized attributes in the CSS test suite. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Friday, 15 October 2010 02:27:48 UTC