- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:24:02 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
> On Thursday 2010-10-14 18:26 -0700, "GĂ©rard Talbot" wrote: >> >> > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/content-072.htm >> > relies on an attribute expansion mechanism that would expand >> > <script defer> to <script defer="defer"> as far as what the CSS >> > attr() function sees. No such mechanism exists in >> > http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/ , so this test is invalid. I tend to >> > think it should be removed. >> >> The default, implied value for defer attribute is "defer" in HTML >> 4.01. >> http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/scripts.html#h-18.2.1 > > That's not true in HTML5, and in HTML4 it was only a piece of > fiction. Then, let's test with checked or selected or readonly. > The CSS test suite is not the place to test that HTML handling is > based on SGML DTD processing. I agree that the CSS 2.1 test suite should not be an HTML4 test suite at the same time. But then a browser should also have a decent compliance with HTML4 to begin with. So what's your opinion on testing on minimized attribute checked or selected or readonly? regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (RC2; October 1st 2010): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Friday, 15 October 2010 02:24:38 UTC