Re: absolute-non-replaced-width-008, absolute-non-replaced-width-009 and background-intrinsic-001

Le Mar 23 novembre 2010 14:58, fantasai a écrit :
> On 11/23/2010 11:23 AM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
>>
>> Le Lun 22 novembre 2010 22:19, fantasai a écrit :
>>> On 10/18/2010 07:14 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This one is failed by all browsers:
>>>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/background-intrinsic-001.htm
>>>> I think Chrome 6 has it correct, though.
>>>
>>> Are you saying the test is wrong,
>>
>> Yes. I was saying that the test is wrong. ...
>>
>> On september 23rd, I sent you an email (subject line had
>> "background-intrinsic-001" in it) on
>
> *digs out that email* Ah, right. Off-list; that's why I didn't
> find it in my search.
>
> Yes, I see what you're talking about. Thanks for figuring that
> out. :) Should be fixed now...
>    http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/fantasai/submitted/css2.1/backgrounds/
>
> (I suspect Firefox fails because it doesn't support SVG backgrounds.)

Firefox fails maybe/possibly because of
Bug 339978: Problems with auto-margins, over-constrained etc (CSS2.1
10.3.7 and 10.6.4)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339978

regards, Gérard
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 test suite (RC3; October 27th 2010):
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101027/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite contributors:
http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/

Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2010 01:01:43 UTC