On 10/23/2010 12:49 AM, fantasai wrote: > On 10/18/2010 06:57 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:09:22 +0200, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> >> wrote: >> >>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/border-collapse-inherited-001.xht >>> >>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/border-collapse-inherited-001.htm >>> >>> >>> These tests make invalid assumptions about the UA style sheet; in >>> particular that it does not have the rule: >>> table { border-collapse: separate } >> (...) >>> This test should be removed. >> >> I guess it could also have another div between the #container and the >> table, and then >> >> table { border-collapse: inherit } > > That's a good idea. It could also use an alternate path with <div>-based > tables, which should not be affected by such reset rules. You could also make the failure more obvious by a) increasing the border-spacing some more b) giving the table box a red background ~fantasaiReceived on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 19:57:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:26:52 UTC