W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > November 2010

Re: replaced-intrinsic-ratio-001 probably invalid

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:50:53 -0800
To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Message-ID: <20101110205053.GA9845@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Monday 2010-10-18 14:36 -0700, L. David Baron wrote:
> I think these tests:
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/replaced-intrinsic-ratio-001.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/replaced-intrinsic-ratio-001.xht
> are probably invalid, largely because of SVG's rule that the svg
> element defaults to width="100%" height="100%" (which is somewhat
> suboptimal).
> But I'm no longer confident in my ability to run through the
> replaced element sizing rules in my head, so I'm not sure.

Per discussions with the SVG group at TPAC, this is not the case,
and the test is correctly showing a bug in implementations.  I filed
the Gecko bug as https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611099

That said, I still haven't checked the test.


L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:51:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:26:52 UTC