- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 14:34:17 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On 03/21/2010 07:32 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 3/16/10 1:36 AM, fantasai wrote: > >> AFAICT, none of the tests in >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/bzbarsky/submitted/css2.1/visuren/ >> >> are testing what they think they're testing. They all continue to >> pass even if I change 'inherit' to 'auto'. > > They do? In what UA? > ... > Can you please double-check and let me know how you reached your > conclusions above? Ok, I don't know what I was looking at. They seem to work fine. :) I can't tell what dynamic-top-changes-004.xht is trying to test. It's very similar to dynamic-top-changes-002.xht, but not quite, and the assertion is completely wrong. I'm also having trouble figuring out what the intention of dynamic-top-changes-005.xht is in its differences from dynamic-top-changes-001.xht. I can say that these tests pass when they should and fail when they should, but I can't say whether they are testing what they are intended to be testing. Does that make sense? ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 14 May 2010 21:34:52 UTC