- From: Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:58:01 +0000
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On 23/12/10 02:24, L. David Baron wrote: > On Wednesday 2010-12-22 18:18 -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> The first-letter-punct-before family of tests are *extremely* hard to >> evaluate. They require intensely scanning each line to look for a >> single 2px by 2px red square. Even ignoring the size, red and green > > For what it's worth, my original draft of the tests used no space > between the lines, so the success condition was just a solid green > block (though uneven at the bottom). Would that be an acceptable > alternative? It'd be better than we have now, though I'm not sure it'd be ideal. Certainly when they were first run here some of the screenshots missed some red, and I know I still missed some when I checked them… It would however solve the issue first-letter-punct-before-015 poses for us: it's taller than the viewport we take a screenshot of. (I understand Gecko does something similar of taking a screenshot of a fixed size for reftests, which would presumably present the same issue.) Is there any reason that references can't be trivially created for the first-letter-punct-before-* tests? -- Geoffrey Sneddon — Opera Software <http://gsnedders.com> <http://opera.com>
Received on Friday, 24 December 2010 15:58:33 UTC