- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:34:59 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Dec 10, 2010, at 1:03 am, fantasai wrote: > Just dumped it on the servers here: > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/ > Built off SVN revision 1701. > > I haven't run much verification on it yet. If you see anything > wrong, let me know. I'll be doing that and putting together the > release notes tomorrow (i.e. later today). > > Most feedback on the tests has been addressed; there are > still some outstanding issues, mainly in the paged media > tests, several of which need a complete rewrite. > > The build system has been updated with better support for > reftests: it handles negative reftest matches now and the > references for a particular test are also listed in the > testinfo.data database. Also, the build system now injects > <link rel="reference" href="..."/> into the test, as > requested. > > The main outstanding request I have is to split the test > suite into multiple directories. (The build system is > architected around doing this, but I haven't actually > implemented the feature yet.) > > Anyway. Lots of tests have changed in very insignficant > ways, due to the reference link injection and also because > a large number of tests were referring to the "ahem" font > instead of the "Ahem" font, so a straight-up diff won't > give useful data on which tests need to be rerun. Stay > tuned for the Release Notes, which will include such useful > information. Is there any estimate about when the Release Notes will become available? I only have enough cycles to re-test the tests that have changed for Safari, but without release notes, and based on your comments above, it's not possible to figure out what I need to re-test. Thanks Simon
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2010 21:35:48 UTC