Re: RC4 Invalid tests

Le Lun 13 décembre 2010 11:55, Peter Linss a écrit :
> The harness is currently reporting 78 tests from RC4 as invalid:
> http://test.csswg.org/harness/results?s=CSS21_%HTML_RC4&f=23
>
> This means that these tests were reported as invalid (from a formal
> implementation report by a vendor) in previous versions of the test
> suite and have not been changed since that report.
>
> I accept that it's possible that some of these tests have been
> examined and found to be valid after all, if that's the case, I need a
> list of those so I can clear the invalid state. If they're genuinely
> invalid, then these are the tests that need fixing first for RC5...
>
> Peter

Hello Peter,

Now valid
---------

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/c5504-mrgn-l-002.htm
because of should flag
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Dec/0002.html


Still INvalid
-------------

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/border-bottom-width-036.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/border-bottom-width-047.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/border-left-width-036.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/border-left-width-047.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/border-right-width-036.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/border-right-width-047.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/border-top-width-036.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/border-top-width-047.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/padding-bottom-047.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/padding-bottom-050.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/padding-bottom-051.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/padding-left-047.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/padding-left-050.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/padding-left-051.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/padding-right-047.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/padding-right-050.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/padding-right-051.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/padding-top-047.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/padding-top-050.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/padding-top-051.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/z-index-020.htm
(still has a negative CSS3 outline-offset)

I have no certainty for the others in your list.

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/bidi-alt-001.htm
bidi-alt-001 should probably be invalid because "elbadaer" alt text
attribute does not have to be styled by direction according to section
3.1

regards, Gérard
P.S. I expect to be unable to connect to internet for the next few days
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 test suite (RC4; December 10th 2010):
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101210/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite contributors:
http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/

Received on Monday, 13 December 2010 21:45:42 UTC