Re: bidi-009 invalid

On 10/13/2010 09:55 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> bidi-009 (which tests display:table-row) has substantially different
> expected results from the tests that precede it (bidi-005 to
> bidi-008).  I don't see any reason for this to be the case; I think
> its expected results should be changed to match the other tests.
>
> I suspect it may be written the way it is because the anonymous
> table object construction rules, at the time it was written,
> mandated that the text, the span, and the text end up in three
> anonymous table cells instead of just one table cell.  However, I
> think the current rules are clear that the contents of the table-row
> should be a single cell.

Fixed.

~fantasai

Received on Sunday, 5 December 2010 09:18:58 UTC