- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:44:38 -0800
- To: "Arron Eicholz" <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Řyvind Stenhaug" <oyvinds@opera.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Le Mer 1 décembre 2010 18:27, Arron Eicholz a écrit : > On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 5:50 PM, Gérard Talbot wrote: >> Le Mar 16 novembre 2010 6:25, Ă~yvind Stenhaug a écrit : >> > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101027/html4/height-applies-to-0 >> > 01.htm >> > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101027/html4/height-applies-to-0 >> > 02.htm >> > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101027/html4/height-applies-to-0 >> > 03.htm >> > >> > Spec's section 17.5.3 states >> > >> > "CSS 2.1 does not define the meaning of 'height' on row groups." >> >> Řyvind, >> >> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-133 >> " >> Issue 133: >> >> Summary >> Ambiguity for row-group-heights >> URL >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jun/0120.html >> Proposal >> Say that row-group heights are undefined Resolution >> Proposal accepted. >> " >> >> >> So that makes height, max-height, min-height supposed to be undefined >> for >> table row groups. >> >> tests testing min/max-height on internal table elements invalid >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Oct/0280.html >> >> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-170 >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10 >> /height-applies-to-001.htm >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10 >> /height-applies-to-002.htm >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10 >> /height-applies-to-003.htm >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10 >> /max-height-applies-to-001.htm >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10 >> /maxheight-applies-to-002.htm >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10 >> /max-height-applies-to-003.htm >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10 >> /min-height-applies-to-001.htm >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10 >> /min-height-applies-to-002.htm >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10 >> /min-height-applies-to-003.htm >> >> >> >> Max-height and min-height should not apply to table-row elements (004) >> and table-cell elements (007). >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10 >> /max-height-applies-to-004.htm >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10 >> /max-height-applies-to-007.htm >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10 >> /min-height-applies-to-004.htm >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10 >> /min-height-applies-to-007.htm >> >> Sections 10.5 and 10.7 should be updated accordingly >> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#the-height-property >> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#min-max-heights >> > > Fixed cases to always pass and to inform that this is a may case. 1- "If 'max-height' is supported on 'table-row-group' then a square will be visible." My neighbour would not need to read this, I'd say; my neighbour would not know what all this is about. Maybe put this in a /* comment */ 2- The assert should explicitly say and state that [max-height|min-height|height] applied on row-groups is undefined and not say, not state that [max-height|min-height|height] applies to row-groups. Same thing with [max-height|min-height] on table-row and table-cell elements. regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (RC3; October 27th 2010): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101027/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Saturday, 4 December 2010 02:45:18 UTC