- From: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 02:27:10 +0000
- To: "css21testsuite@gtalbot.org" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Thursday, November 04, 2010 8:21 AM Gérard Talbot wrote: > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101027/html4/absolute-non-replaced- > height-004.htm > > http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_10 > /absolute-non-replaced-height-004.htm > > > has the following assert: > > <meta name="assert" content="When 'top', 'bottom' and 'height' are all are > not 'auto', 'margin-top' is 'auto' and 'margin-bottom' is not 'auto'. Then > 'margin-top' becomes the remainder of the height of the containing box."> > > > I suggest to replace it with > > <meta name="assert" content="When 'top', 'bottom', 'height' and 'margin- > bottom' of an absolutely positioned, non-replaced element are all not 'auto' > while its 'margin-top' is 'auto', then 'margin-top' > becomes the remainder of the height of its containing block."> > > > ------------ > > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101027/html4/numbers-units-008.htm > > http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_4/ > numbers-units-008.htm > > > Same reasoning as for numbers-units-014. If there is no specified, normative > scaling factor for x-large or larger (relative to the 'medium' > font size) or for adjacent indexes [1], then the used height of 1em of a x- > large font-size can not be predicted. Therefore this can not be testcase-ed. > > CSS1 was specifying this: "On a computer screen a scaling factor of 1.5 is > suggested between adjacent indexes" [2] > > > Anyway.. the testcase compares a 1em wide by 1em tall box with a 1em black > "X" in ahem font: it's the exact same thing regardless of how x-large is scaled, > rendered in user agents. The testcase, as coded, can not fail. If the scaling > factor was specified by the spec and if it was > - say, for/from medium to x-large - 1.5 (150%), then the testcase would still > require adjustements. > > Again, numbers-units-014 and numbers-units-008 are not testing what they > were originally trying to test. It is not possible to test larger and x-large if the > scaling factor is unknown and unspecified by CSS 2.1 spec. > > > [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#font-size-props > [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS1/#font-size > Fixed: absolute-non-replaced-height-004 Removed: number-unites-008 -- Thanks, Arron Eicholz
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:27:46 UTC