- From: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 02:27:27 +0000
- To: "css21testsuite@gtalbot.org" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, Bruno Fassino <fassino@gmail.com>
On Wednesday, November 17, 2010 12:04 PM Gérard Talbot wrote: > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101027/html4/top-offset-002.htm > > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101027/xhtml1/top-offset-002.xht > > http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_9/ > top-offset-002.xht > > I propose to replace > > <title>CSS Test: Position 'top' property defines the offset from the top > content edge of the parent box for relative positioning</title> > (...) > <meta name="assert" content="The 'top' property, for relative > positioning, specifies the offset of the element in relation to the parent's top > content edge." /> > > with (proposed replacement) > > <title>CSS Test: 'top' offset property - absolute length value and relative > positioning</title> > (...) > <meta name="assert" content="The 'top' property, when using an > absolute length value (not percentage) for relative positioning, specifies the > offset of the box itself." /> > > Bruno Fassino reported this issue before: > About Microsoft test bottom-offset-002.xht and similar ones > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Feb/0040.html > Fixed all cases that were top/left/bottom/right -offset-002 all has similar issues. -- Thanks, Arron Eicholz
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:28:14 UTC