- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:19:48 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
L. David Baron wrote: > On Tuesday 2009-09-15 21:06 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: >> An initial contribution of Mozilla reftests towards the CSS >> 2.1 test suite is contained in: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Sep/att-0034/moztests.zip > > Here's an updated version of this archive, now with 193 test > assertions. It includes a newer version of the block-inside-inline > tests that I wasn't aware of, and also some border collapsing tests > that I got licensing permission for after I sent the message last > night. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Sep/att-0042/moztests.zip > > To be clear, these tests are provided under either of the licenses > in http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2008/04-testsuite-copyright Ok, I've checked the tests into svn at http://test.csswg.org/svn/contributors/mozilla/incoming/reftests/ You should have access to the repository already; ping me if you've lost your password. Initial comments from a random audit: 1. 'opacity' is not a CSS2.1 property 2. HTML is not an acceptable format for CSS2.1 tests, please convert to valid XHTML (1.1 or 1.0). 3. The metadata for the table backgrounds test doesn't seem to make any sense; they're all linked to the anonymous boxes section. 4. Do you have a plan for keeping these tests in sync with Mozilla's copy? Or do you not care about that? ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 00:20:31 UTC