- From: Robert Stam <robert@tallcomponents.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:22:38 -0500
- To: <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
- Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-css-testsuite-request@w3.org [mailto:public-css-testsuite- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of L. David Baron > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 6:59 PM > To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org > Subject: Re: attribute-value-selector-004.xht not well formed > > On Tuesday 2009-03-10 10:59 -0700, Arron Eicholz wrote: > > The rule is in 5.8.1 "Attribute values must be identifiers or > > strings." > Not sure, but it looks like the test don't use an attribute value, but an attribute name (which must be an IDENT) > But that's not a statement about selector matching. It's only an > authoring conformance requirement and a statement about validity, > and it's only turned into an implementation conformance requirement > by the statement in 4.1.7: > > # When a user agent can't parse the selector (i.e., it is not > # valid CSS 2.1), it must ignore the declaration block as well. > > -David > > -- > L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ > Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ > > > Best Regards, Robert Stam TallComponents
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 18:23:30 UTC