- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:24:20 -0700
- To: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Tuesday 2009-03-10 12:09 -0700, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > And how can you possibly test for it given that any > > correct implementation is going to throw the rule out anyway? > > That seems circular. Should we test user agents under the > assumption that their implementation is correct ? I'm not quite > sure I understand why XHTML or HTML well-formedness should take > precedence over test coverage when that could allow a buggy > implementation to pass the test *and* select the attribute. What the spec requires is dropping the entire rule, which is a stronger requirement than what you're testing for (failing to match one selector within it), not a weaker one. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 19:24:58 UTC