- From: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:43:09 +0000
- To: "css21testsuite@gtalbot.org" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
All corrected, updated and resubmitted. Thank you for the feedback. -- Thanks, Arron Eicholz -----Original Message----- From: public-css-testsuite-request@w3.org [mailto:public-css-testsuite-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gérard Talbot Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 9:36 PM To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org Subject: 1 Microsoft border conflict resolution and border-style: hidden test: feedback Hello all, This test http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_17/border-conflict-width-035.xht has 2 problems and should be reviewed. 1- The entire title states " CSS Test: Border Conflict Resolution (by border width): 'groove' vs. 'hidden' - border style with largest width should be the dominant border " but this is not what section 17.6.2.1 Border conflict resolution states: " (...) any occurrence of the style 'hidden' unconditionally turns the border off. (...) The following rules determine which border style "wins" in case of a conflict: 1. Borders with the 'border-style' of 'hidden' take precedence over all other conflicting borders. Any border with this value suppresses all borders at this location. " http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#border-conflict-resolution Also, the meta assert is also irrelevant when it says "The widest border is dominant when two cell borders collapse." regards, Gérard
Received on Wednesday, 30 December 2009 17:43:45 UTC