- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:19:22 -0700
- To: Sergey Malkin <sergeym@windows.microsoft.com>
- CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Sergey Malkin wrote: > fantasai wrote: > >> I will forward your comments to the CSS Working Group and see if > anyone there can fix the font. > > I think I can take care of that, and will also double run it with font > testers in our typography group to make sure Ahem meets quality bar. That would be awesome. > There are some improvements that can be made to Ahem, making it better > suited for CSS testing. E.g. I added ideographic space (U+3000) for > our testers, because they needed to properly validate its behavior > along with regular space. If you have a list of other things you would > like to see added, I do not think they will be hard to do at the same > time. We probably want appropriate glyphs for all spaces and perhaps also the zero-width characters (zwsp, zwj, zwnj, etc.) and bidi control characters if they need to have glyphs. (I don't know whether these invisible characters need invisible glyphs, or if they're taken out of processing beforehand.) The W3C's copy of Ahem is here: http://dev.w3.org/CSS/fonts/ahem/ We'll want to update the README accordingly. ~fantasai
Received on Sunday, 15 June 2008 17:20:05 UTC