- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:58:03 +1000
- To: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
- CC: Gabriele Romanato <gabriele.romanato@gmail.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Chris Wilson wrote: > As for the layout system in IE up through IE7 (of which hasLayout was a side effect), it was never intended to HAVE effects that would prevent it from passing any CSS test. Well since hasLayout is history there shouldn't be a need for testing for hasLayout. > As for importing all of the tests from www.brunildo.org/test<http://www.brunildo.org/test> (or any other suite of tests out there), I think we all want the most comprehensive suite possible; all that is really needed is the author to enable an appropriate license on their tests, and someone to sign up to format them into the CSS 2.1 Test Suite (and the reviewers to review, and make sure they're not just overlap with tests that are already there, of course). > > -Chris To right there Chris. There Bruno Fassino's test cases. http://www.brunildo.org/test/ My own. http://css-class.com/test/ But none of these can simply be included in the CSS test suite. They are intended for authors and not implementors. They are largely designed to analyze or demonstrate why particular bug behavior happens (if that's possible). I would like to have some of my test cases included but none in their current format. Both Bruno and myself are very aware of what duplications there are so it much simpler for us to breakdown these mass test cases into individual test. Then there are the extra test cases of bug behavior still in the pipeline. Another issue is that some test cases are involving undefined behavior in CSS2.1. This needs to be defined on the CSS WG list before such test cases can be included in any CSS test suite. Alan
Received on Saturday, 26 April 2008 00:58:59 UTC