- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 03:04:18 -0400
- To: Michael Turnwall <mturnwall@revenution.com>
- CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Michael Turnwall wrote: > Edits have been made. http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break-after-always-01-a.xht Added as page-break-after-000.xht http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break-after-auto-02-a.xht Added as page-break-after-001.xht and removed extraneous .dummy rule. http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break-after-invalid-syntax-15-a.xht I wrote: > This test is incorrect. > ... > BTW, did you run your tests in Prince to see if they pass? Because this > one, as written, should have failed. The test is still incorrect. And you did not answer my question about whether or not you tested in PrinceXML. http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break-after-inline-elements-16-a.xht Added as page-break-after-002.xht http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break-after-no-inherit-17-a.xht Added as page-break-after-003.xht ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 5 October 2007 07:05:46 UTC