- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:05:14 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:34:32 +0200, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > I've added the general assumptions used throughout the test suite to the > index page: > > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/CSS/CSS2.1-test-suite/data/index.html > > Any style rule that's /not/ covered by that list is game for being > explicitly added to or overridden in a test if an implementor complains > that his UA's default style sheet doesn't meet the test's expectations. > > If an HTML UA's default style sheet doesn't match those style rule > assumptions, then it has bigger problems than passing the CSS2.1 test > suite. You missed thead, etc. Also, I wonder what all the fuss is about. If a testcase renders different in two desktop browsers because of the default style sheet isn't that a good reason for aligning more? Are there any concrete examples where this is found to be a problem? -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 29 June 2007 09:05:37 UTC