W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > July 2007

Implementation report template for 20060307 css3-selectors test ?suite

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:21:03 -0700
To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Cc: w3c-css-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070710082103.GA24941@ridley.dbaron.org>
I updated the implementation report template at
based on the change list at:
to match the 20060307 version of the test suite.  The revised
implementation report is at:

I did this by making the following changes:

1. fixed the double-spacing in the markup that covered most of the

2. search-replace 20041216 with 20060307

3. Make the changes shown in the diff at
which are:

   a. remove the removed tests (180, 19a, 84, 84b, 85, 163)
   b. Add test 27b, listed as a failure test under "descendant
      combinator" (although I'm not sure if it should really be a
      failure test)
   c. Add test 27a, listed as a failure test under :first-child,
      :only-child, :last-child, :nth-child, :nth-last-child,
      :first-of-type, :only-of-type, :last-of-type, :nth-of-type,
      and :nth-last-of-type.  I'm not sure if it should be a failure
      test, though.  I'm also a little uncomfortable listing it in
      so many places, but I can't think of a better solution.
   d. add myself as a co-author

I also wrote a test suite for the implementation report, written in
HTML + JavaScript.  It caught a number of mistakes I made with file
extensions, but did not catch mistakes in the existing
implementation report.  It is at:
See the comment at the top for instructions.

Should I be listing 27a and 27b as failure tests?

And does anybody see a better solution for how to list 27a?


L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/

Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2007 08:21:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:12 UTC