- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:14:25 -0400
- To: Ray Kiddy <ray@ganymede.org>
- CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Ray Kiddy wrote: > > On Jul 3, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Arron Eicholz wrote: > >> fantasai wrote: >>> >>> I think we should go with 'flags', as it's more general and we might >>> want to add non-requirement flags later. In any case the name is something I >>> can change very easily. >> >> I will change it in the wiki and I will update our template on our end. > > So, are you all just adding 'interact' and 'scrolling' flags and such to > the wiki? These are not being put in the tests? > > Is there a reason to not put these flags into the test comments also? We're /documenting/ them in the wiki. The flags will appear in the tests as well, in a <meta> tag. A lot of these flags are already associated with the existing tests, but they are in the filename, not in the meta data. I should be able to focus on testing several weeks from now, and at that point I will work on converting all the existing tests to match the new flags format. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 04:14:34 UTC