- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:27:00 -0400
- To: Ray Kiddy <ray@ganymede.org>
- CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Ray Kiddy wrote: > > I find this to be a problem generally and I am surprised to see this in > the CSS spec. Or am I misunderstanding something? > > See: http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/t1202-counter-09-b.htm > > I am on a Mac running Mac OS X 10.4.9. With Firefox 2.0.0.4, if I > display this page, I see either two rows of question marks, or two rows > of glyphs that are made of squares with a 4-digit hex number in them, > which is obviously how FF is displaying unknown Unicode code points. > > With a debug build of the Firefox trunk (to be FF 3), I see only the > hex-square glyphs. > > With Opera, I see just squares. > > In all these cases, the test would seem to be passing, as it says "The > following two lines should look the same:". > > Should all of these tests be passing? > > Is the CSS saying something about what we should be seeing here? Or is > it just saying that, whatever one sees, one should see two identical > rows of them? > > The latter would make sense. The former opens up big questions. How can > a visual comparison within a web page, such as this, verify correct > glyph rendering? I am working on tests that involve image comparisons to > get around this limitation, but I am not sure that would be desirable here. > > Can anyone speak to the intent of this and similar tests? You're right, there's a problem here. You need to have the appropriate fonts for any test results for these to be valid, and we should add that to the test description. Can you make a list of tests with these problems? You can add them to http://csswg.inkedblade.net/test/css2.1/issues#tests-assume-non-latin-font-availability or just post them here. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2007 02:27:11 UTC