- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:59:24 +0100
- To: "Stewart Brodie" <stewart.brodie@antplc.com>, public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:53:41 +0100, Stewart Brodie <stewart.brodie@antplc.com> wrote: > The empty string is not a valid media specifier according to the syntax > definition in the specification, so I agree with you there. However, the > discrepancy between "" and "," does not feel right. I don't think you > can have it both ways - you'd have to modify the syntax for > media_query_list to permit an empty string for the whole media query and > define it as being an alias for "all". Yes, that's the plan. > Did you ever resolve the "not foo" issue? The issue being whether > unknown media types are always false, regardless of the 'not', or > whether this case it true because the not always negates the result of > evaluating the rest of the query. Good point. I should add tests for those too. The plan of the WG is that "not foo" would be an ignored media query (parse error basically). If you have media="not foo,all" it would evaluate to true and if you have media="not foo" it would evaluate to false. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 10 December 2007 10:58:55 UTC