- From: Bruno Melloni <Bruno.Melloni@akuratus.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 07:48:12 -0500
- To: <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Thanks to all, I'll move this discussion to www-style@w3.org. Boris, I apologize if I misinterpreted your explanation, maybe the issue I am trying to resolve is in the 100% handling, not in the overflow? Or maybe in the interaction of the two? Or maybe the omission of an explicit DOCTYPE is what is causing the issues? (I will test the DOCTYPE before posting in www-style) Please remember that I am looking at the issue with the eyes of a "normal developer", not those of a CSS spec expert. It could very well be that the spec reads differently to someone who learns the spec from books, tutorials and references than it reads to someone who participated in its design. I say this because every developer (non-spec-experts) that I talked to seems to interpret that the specific CSS we are trying to do (as specified in the example) is supposed to work in the way that IE did. I am no fan of IE, and I usually avoid it like the plague because of security issues, but we are now dependent on it because at least from a layman's perspective it "appears" to follow the standard, "it works" and we have found no other alternative to achieve the functionality. Bruno Melloni Director of Software Architecture Akuratus Corporation 1333 N. Stemmons Fwy, Suite 110 Dallas, Texas 75207 Phone: 469.227.0920 Fax: 469.227.0967 bruno.melloni@akuratus.com www.akuratus.com
Received on Friday, 2 September 2005 12:48:47 UTC