Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900)

I'd like to propose republishing CSS-UI-3 as an updated REC.

Compared to the previous publication, it contains three normative changes marked as "proposed corrections". I've taken the liberty of marking them as _proposed_ rather than _candidate_, though we could argue about that. In any case, we'll need to document that they're adequately tested, and solicit appropriately wide review, before we can fold them in normatively. We may chose to publish them as candidate corrections first until that's done, and then republish as _proposed_ and run the corresponding [Last Call for Review of Proposed Amendments](https://www.w3.org/policies/process/#last-call-review). The Process does not require it, but AC Reps might push back and ask to see these steps first before approving.

I consider all other changes since last publication as REC to be editorial, though some were quite extensive. In particular, I'd like to call attention to https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/1a57a4025c8778dab45ef8d5fbd482e4d6c4ebce. It did introduce [a bug](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13001), which is now [fixed](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/13018), as well as some redundant text, which is now [fixed](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/d53db3c9b220d30d7ac91b82029cf6bbd49c2c00) too. With these two fixes in place, I do think it is editorial, but I'd encourage others to double check.

The [change section](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-3/#changes-2018-06-21) is up to date.



-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6900#issuecomment-4036915567 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2026 06:50:40 UTC