- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 23:36:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Republishing Tasks Permathread`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Republish UI 3 as an updated Rec` * `RESOLVED: Publish CSS Image Animations as FPWD` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <iank_> no just will walk my dog otherwise.<br> <TabAtkins> florian: I'd like to repub CSs UI 3<br> <TabAtkins> florian: currently a Rec, we've made normative changes. they're annotated as candidate corrections<br> <TabAtkins> florian: also editorial changes, they're not specially marked<br> <TabAtkins> florian: and on the basis of having repubbed we can gather review/experience, and then fold in the candidate corrections<br> <TabAtkins> astearns: you said they're candidate corrections; in the issue they're proposed<br> <TabAtkins> florian: Chris pushed back that they should be candidate<br> <TabAtkins> florian: there's an annoying difference<br> <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: I don't care about the diff while i'm minuting<br> <TabAtkins> florian: [explains anyway]<br> <TabAtkins> ChrisL: does Proposed trigger an exclusion opportunity?<br> <TabAtkins> florian: yes. Candidate doesn't. counts as a WD for the purposes of the patent policy<br> <TabAtkins> astearns: so you've done the work on the backport<br> <TabAtkins> florian: yes<br> <TabAtkins> florian: so propose to publish as Rec, having Candidate changes in there makes the update technically editorial<br> <TabAtkins> astearns: objections?<br> <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Republish UI 3 as an updated Rec<br> <TabAtkins> florian: also, CSS Image Animation<br> <TabAtkins> florian: last time I published an ED, there were comments about things to flesh out for FPWD<br> <TabAtkins> florian: I think I've done everything, if anyone still has objection to FPWD let me know<br> <TabAtkins> astearns: I ahven't reviewed yet. I know there was back and forth over naming/etc<br> <TabAtkins> florian: Yeah, I think the problem space is now fully covered; solution isn't necessary done yet.<br> <TabAtkins> astearns: i'm good with it<br> <TabAtkins> ChrisL: i'm good<br> <TabAtkins> astearns: objections?<br> <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Publish CSS Image Animations as FPWD<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6900#issuecomment-4166368756 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2026 23:36:48 UTC