Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Backwards combinators (#12453)

> Shouldn't that be `B:has(> :is(A C))`

Yep, I wanted to mention this example, but it is better when someone else shows that things can be read in different ways, and for someone who does not know the details, they couldn't easily understand what is the correct way without trying, which can lead to mistakes.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kizu
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12453#issuecomment-3043759062 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 7 July 2025 07:18:06 UTC