- From: Romain Menke via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 07:08:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> `A C < B` — if this is the same as `A B:has(> C)`, it makes it really difficult to read at a glance. Shouldn't that be `B:has(> :is(A C))` - `B` is the parent of `C` - `A` is an ancestor of `C` - `B` is the matched element But yeah, this inverting will cause confusion. > it makes it really difficult to read at a glance I agree, I think there are some benefits to this when writing CSS, but I fear it will be very detrimental to reading/reviewing. However anyone is free to use a linter to disallow such language features :) -- GitHub Notification of comment by romainmenke Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12453#issuecomment-3043736029 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 7 July 2025 07:09:00 UTC