Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Backwards combinators (#12453)

Yes, I think this would be intrinsically ambiguous, requiring parenthesis to disambiguate:

- `A (C < B)` would be `A B:has(> :is(C))`
- `(A C) < B` would be `B:has(> :is(A C))`

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12453#issuecomment-3045555255 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 7 July 2025 15:06:26 UTC