- From: Roman Komarov via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 06:48:40 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> at least for bounded combinators like parent and previous sibling, simply having them could make them more performant than the `:has()` version. I think this, for me, is the biggest argument to add something like this. Making the bounded versions easier to access will really make a difference. The main issue that I see is that inverting the order of things in a selector can be confusing. It is understandable that we'd want to keep the subject on the right, but then how do we treat complex selectors? `A C < B` — if this is the same as `A B:has(> C)`, it makes it really difficult to read at a glance. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kizu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12453#issuecomment-3043672786 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 7 July 2025 06:48:41 UTC