Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] What counts as "immediately preceding" for `block-ellipsis`? (#10868)

> I agree with excluding (clamping) the trailing abspos in the clamp by height scenario. I think a spec way to achieve that could be to say, in https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overflow-4/#line-clamp-containers where the 3 possible positions for clamp points are defined, to say something like this in the third one:
> 
> > * A point between two [in-flow](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-4/#in-flow) [block-level](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-4/#block-level) sibling boxes in the line-clamp container’s [block formatting context](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-4/#block-formatting-context). If there are out-of-flow boxes whose static position falls between such to two in-flow block-level siblings, the clamp point is consider being before them.

Would we need an resolution for this? If so, can we make it an async resolution?

cc @astearns 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by andreubotella
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10868#issuecomment-3043670450 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 7 July 2025 06:47:38 UTC