- From: Isaac Muse via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 17:43:42 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I'm just not sure if this is a productive contribution. I think I've made it clear that I'm not okay with "bad results" and that I'm explicitly trying to avoid being "surprising to authors". > > **Re: "surprising to authors"**. > > I posted this image earlier, but here's an updated version. I'm still not quite sure how a wider gamut can have such a disparity in lightness. If we attempt a very magenta color in display-p3 and crank up the lightness until we are around 90% (with no gamut mapping required), we get a pale color, because it is so bright! <img width="1363" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-06 at 10 41 42 AM" src="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/assets/1055125/a33da9ea-c279-4ac5-ab65-19e23acf4a7f"> So how does 90% lightness look so much lower here in a wider gamut? Are we sure we aren't comparing something that is producing colors not quite right? I'm not arguing tone, but the lightness looks really, really wrong, but the claim here is that it should be matched. This is a serious question because it doesn't seem like it is adding up. Perceptually, that doesn't look like 90% lightness. <img width="768" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-06 at 10 38 28 AM" src="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/assets/1055125/a390018f-4695-4775-8e30-876603400f95"> -- GitHub Notification of comment by facelessuser Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9449#issuecomment-1981451808 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2024 17:43:43 UTC