- From: DavidJCobb via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 17:43:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I’m not a huge fan of `control-points()`, but note that the current syntax has the points specified as basically a series of `<length-percentage>` with no distinction of what is x and what is y, which will be quite hard to read (try it: `via 1em 2em 300px 30vmin` vs `control-points(1em 2em, 300px 30vmin)`). If we can find a non-functional syntax to distinguish the two points, that would be the best of both worlds (e.g. separate keywords? slash?). For sequences of multiple control points, why not just say `via` again? `via 3px 5px via 6px 7px`? Shorter than functional notation, still explicit, and avoids burning another keyword (e.g. `and`). -- GitHub Notification of comment by DavidJCobb Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9889#issuecomment-1944308092 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2024 17:44:02 UTC