- From: Roman Komarov via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:11:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I really think that spanning items should _not_ contribute to the width of the columns in masonry. Even in a regular grid, this is the behavior that I find unnecessary and often harmful, and I don't think there are many legit use cases for wanting this in a masonry layout. As an author, when I want some element to span other columns/rows, I want it to _adapt_ to whatever there is, not to _contribute_. (copying this part from https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9041#issuecomment-2074586448) When some `auto` column has _only_ spanning items contributing to it, I would rather consider it be `minmax(0px, 1fr)` (when with regular `auto`) or just `0px` when it is in a repeating context. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kizu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10053#issuecomment-2074596596 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2024 10:11:09 UTC